@thisemailfindsyou Hari Seldon be like:
Just pushed the brand-new @buddiesofbudgie #Budgie Desktop 10.9.2 to the @Solus Unstable repository! It will reach all #Solus Budgie users with the next sync. Awesome stuff, everyone!
@thisemailfindsyou 淦,摸个鱼都能被发现
I feel like surely people on this network would appreciate knowing that the BBC sound effect library, from which you may freely download, has 716 distinct recordings of clocks specifically https://sound-effects.bbcrewind.co.uk/
@mashiro 看来站长最近精神状态良好
@thisemailfindsyou 这个bot最近都是什么逆天发言
#ScientificAmerican recently reprinted an interview I had a few months ago on the future of proof assistants and #AI in #math: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ai-will-become-mathematicians-co-pilot/ . In it, I made the following assertion:
"I think in the future, instead of typing up our proofs, we would explain them to some #GPT. And the GPT will try to formalize it in #Lean as you go along. If everything checks out, the GPT will [essentially] say, “Here’s your paper in #LaTeXmath; here’s your Lean proof. If you like, I can press this button and submit it to a journal for you.” It could be a wonderful assistant in the future."
This statement seems to have received a mixed reception, in particular it has been interpreted as an assertion that mathematicians would be become lazier and sloppier with writing proofs. I think the best way to illustrate what I mean by this assertion is by a worked example, which is already within the capability of current technology. At https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2016/10/18/a-problem-involving-power-series/ I have a moderately tricky problem in complex analysis. In https://chatgpt.com/share/63c5774a-d58a-47c2-9149-362b05e268b4 , I explained this problem and its solution to #ChatGPT in an interactive fashion, and after the proof was explained, GPT was able to provide a LaTeX file of the solution, which one can find at https://terrytao.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/laplace.pdf . GPT performed quite well in my opinion, fleshing out my sketched argument into quite a coherent and reasonably rigorous full proof. This is not 100% of what I envisioned in the article - in particular the rigorous Lean translation in order to guarantee correctness is missing, which I think is an essential requirement before this workflow can be used for research quality publications - but hopefully will illustrate what I had in mind with the quote.
@11abac 同意!尤其是电子书阅读器+mp3真的是绝配。我是remarkable配上walkman,啃论文体验非常好
@ning 一时间分不清这是你的晚餐还是狗子的晚餐
@mashiro 企业级和生产力用户感觉确实不太现实,但个人用户需求基本上够了,至少对我来说是这样的。
@mangoiv Basel in Switzerland?
First full day running @buddiesofbudgie #Budgie Desktop on top of a Wayland compositor. Even in it's still very heavily WIP form.
Panel exclusion zone now implemented and thanks to some rubber ducking / help from @EbonJaeger , figured out what was wrong with my Budgie PopoverRedux.
Old Budgie.Popover code is gone, all the popovers are using the new implementation which are basically just Gtk.Popover. It'll be renamed back to Budgie.Popover once I do cleanup of PopoverManager and maybe refactor some more code.
Screenshot shows the bluetooth applet... well now being shown, as well as VS Code not being allowed to be maximized under the panel.
Biggest usability thing next for me will be making Raven not 100% full screen and the panel to always be set to the primary monitor rather than whichever monitor is in focus.
@ning 未能检测到油泼辣子,推测不够辣,差评
history = (λx. x x) (λx. x x)
When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back! Get mad! I don't want your damn lemons, what the heck am I supposed to do with these?